Sitara And ANR v. State Of Haryana And Others

CRWP No. 3435 of 2020 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. 3435 of 2020 (O&M) Date of decision : 4.6.2020 ...

Sitara and another ................Petitioners vs.

State of Haryana and others .................Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan Present: Mr. Sunil K. Tandon, Advocate for the petitioners.

...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral) Case taken up through video conferencing.

It is contended that petitioner No.1 - Sitara, aged about 25 years has got married with petitioner No.2- Sumit, aged about 26 years, against the wishes of her family members, arrayed as private respondents No. 4 to 6, who are threatening to interfere in their marital life, as such to seek protection in that regard, the petitioners have approached this Court by way of filing the present petition. Of course nobody can be allowed to take law into his hands and to indulge in illegal activities.

Notice of motion to respondent State.

At this stage, Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, DAG, Haryana, has BANITA CHUGH 2020.06.04 07:05 I am the author of this document

CRWP No. 3435 of 2020 -2accepted notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3. Heard.

The petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 - Superintendent of Police, District Yamuna Nagar, to look into the grievances of the petitioners and to take necessary measures to ensure that lives and liberty of the petitioners are not jeopardized at the hands of respondents No. 4 to 6 or persons claiming under them. However, this order shall not validate the marriage between the petitioners and shall not have any effect on any civil or criminal action to which the petitioners may be found liable, under the law. ( H.S. Madaan ) 4.6.2020 Judge chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No BANITA CHUGH 2020.06.04 07:05 I am the author of this document