High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/27140/2016disposed of

Neelam v. State Of Haryana & ORS

2017-02-03Mr. Justice Satpal3 pages

[1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M- 27140 of 2016(O&M) Date of Decision: February 3 , 2017.

Neelam ...... PETITIONER (s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL

Present:

Mr. Narender Singh Kamboj, Advocate for the petitioner.

*****

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? ***** LISA GILL, J.

CRM No.28901 of 2016 Learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner submits that the petitioner is an illiterate lady and she was not aware that FIR No.220 dated 26.10.2013 under Sections 498A/406/506/34 IPC had been registered against her husband and family members. Therefore, necessary averment could not be made in the petition. It was inadvertently mentioned in Para 4 of the petition that a complaint under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sirsa for registration of a case against the accused is pending. This application has been filed praying that necessary amendment in Para 4 of the main petition be allowed to the extent that proceedings in FIR

[2] No.220 dated 26.10.2013 under Sections 498A/406/506/34 IPC registered at Police Station Ding, District Sirsa are pending before the learned trial court. The Challan in the said case has been presented. Ordered accordingly.

Application is disposed of.

CRM No.28902-903 of 2016 A translation/true copy of FIR No.220 dated 26.10.2013 under Sections 498A/406/506/34 IPC registered at Police Station Ding, District Sirsa is taken on record subject to just exceptions. Filing of certified copy thereof is dispensed with.

Application is disposed of.

CRM No.M-27140 of 2016 Prayer in this petition is for registration of FIR against respondents No.4 to 10 under Sections 494/109 IPC as respondent No.4 has solemnized a second marriage illegally. It is averred in the petition that no action is being taken by the police.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No.4 has solemnized second marriage on 15.07.2016 and a representation in this regard was submitted before the police authorities on 11.07.2016. However, no action has been taken thereon. It is submitted, at this stage, that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction be issued to the official respondents to look into the petitioner's representation and take necessary action. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the limited prayer addressed but without commenting or

[3] expressing any views on merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 is directed to look into the representation dated 11.07.2016 (Annexure P6) submitted by the petitioner and take appropriate action as may be required thereon in accordance with law. ( LISA GILL ) February 3 , 2017.

JUDGE 'om'

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No