Satish Kumar v. Ramesh Chand & ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-26415 of 2014 Date of Decision: 26.02.2019 Satish Kumar

...Petitioner

Versus

ASI Ramesh Chand and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present:- Ms. Vanita Jain, Advocate, for Mr. Gurinder Pal Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjay Verma, Advocate, for Mr. Rohit Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Munish Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for respondent No.1 submits that instant petition has rendered infructuous. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has not disputed the above submission. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (RAMENDRA JAIN) February 26, 2019 JUDGE R.S.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2019.02.27 16:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document