Sunita And ANR v. State Of Haryana And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-26373-2017 Date of Decision: 06.02.2019 Sunita and another .... Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present:
Ms. Kusum Raj, Advocate for Mr. SS Sahu, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Raj Kumar Makkar, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel submits that the instant petition has rendered infructuous, in view of the fact that grievance of the petitioners raised in this petition has already been redressed. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
February 06, 2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2019.02.07 16:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document