Ram Kishan v. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitram Nigan Limited Through Its Managing Director

   

      
 

     

  

 



!

"

 #$% 

&'

(

 )

'

* +  '' 

   

  ,  

        

  +   +

%-./

  

,

 

 +  0

  1-./

  



,     !"

#  )

 ,

   /%  2   ,

  

  1

  %   

.

%  3


 

*     2  







 '



,   ,

   

%

 

  .
 '

  

,

 



.
% 2

 %%   %1   

%'2



56,

 7

-   

  

,   





,

 



 8 8 9:. ;

< / 1"

,

 



'

'

, "  .
 ,





  2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if the representation (Annexure P-2) of the petitioner is decided by respondent No.1 by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner. 3.

Learned counsel for the respondents appearing on advanced notice, submits that he has no objection in case a direction is issued to respondent No.1 for time-bound consideration and decision of the representation of the petitioner by passing a speaking order. NEHA 2026.03.12 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-7362-2026 -24.

Therefore, in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent No.1 is directed to consider the representation (Annexure P-2) of the petitioner in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in CWP No.13150 of 2022 titled as Gulshan Kumar and others Vs. State of Haryana and another decided on 29.07.2022 (Annexure P-3) and pass a speaking order, after affording him an opportunity to be heard, within a period of 03 months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereof shall be conveyed to the petitioner. Needless to say, if the petitioner is found entitled to the relief sought, the same shall be granted forthwith by respondent No.1.

9

, -  '%" "  #  

$$%   

,

0'3

   = 3& 



,

1%  = 3& NEHA 2026.03.12 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document