Tarlochan Singh & ORS v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M No. 26398 of 2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 26398 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 23.10.2017 ...

Tarlochan Singh and others ................Petitioners vs.

State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan Present: Mr. S.K. Bawa, Advocate for Mr. Inderjit Shrma, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Samina Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. M.K. Bhatnagar, Advocate for complainant - Swaran Kaur @ Maninder Kaur.

...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Gurmail Singh, from Police Station SGN Dev Thermal Plant, Bathinda, states that the petitioners have since furnished their affidavits that they are not holding any passport. The State counsel further submits that petitioners are not required for further investigation. Mr. M.K. Bhatnagar, Advocate representing the complainant states that the matter has since been compromised between the parties and the petition for quashing the FIR on the basis of compromise is pending for 2.11.2017 and he has no objection if the prayer made by Banita Chugh 2017.10.23 18:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M No. 26398 of 2017 -2the petitioners in this petition is accepted. Accordingly, the interim bail granted to the petitioners vide interim order dated 8.8.2017 is made absolute, subject to fulfillment of conditions under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

In that way, the petition stands allowed.

( H.S. Madaan ) Judge 23.10.2017 chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No Banita Chugh 2017.10.23 18:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh