Haruni And ORS v. Tek Chand And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH (231) FAO-1870-2002 Date of Decision:-09.12.2025 Haruni and Others ......Appellants

Versus

Tek Chand and Others ......Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL ****

Present:

None for the parties.

**** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral) 1.

The entire record relating to the present case is reported to have been burnt. As such, no substantive material is presently available on the file for consideration by this Court.

2.

As per office report, learned counsel for the appellants has been duly intimated about the present case. However, despite lapse of considerable time, neither party has furnished any of the requisite documents. Consequently, there are no particulars such as memorandum of parties, grounds of appeal, or supporting annexures available on record for adjudication.

3.

Despite the above, there is no representation on behalf of either party before this Court today. The absence of representation, coupled with the failure to provide the necessary documents, clearly indicates that the appellants are not interested in pursuing the present appeal. 4.

A perusal of the case file further reveals that the present appeal has been pending since the year 2002. In the absence of the record, -1SHUBHAM 2025.12.10 10:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/order

pleadings, or active participation from the appellant, this Court is unable to proceed further in the matter.

5.

In view of the above, this Court is left with no option but to dispose of the present appeal, with liberty to the appellants to file an appropriate application, if any cause of action still survives. 6.

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE 09.12.2025 Shubham Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No -2SHUBHAM 2025.12.10 10:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/order