Kdp Infrastructure Pvt Ltd And ANR v. Raj Kumar Tayal And ANR

COCP-739-2022 166-A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH COCP-739-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 29, 2026 KDP Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (Through its Director) and anr. ....Petitioners Vs.

Raj Kumar Tayal and anr.

.....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Present:

Mr. Deepkaran Dalal, Advocate (Throuh VC) and Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Vishal Sodhi, Advocate for respondent No. 2.

* * * SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (Oral) 1.

The present contempt petition has been filed for non-compliance and disobedience of order dated 10.09.2019 passed by Division Bench of this Court in CRM-M-43677-2017 and terms and conditions of settlement/agreement dated 09.09.2019.

2.

On the last date of hearing i.e 26.05.2026, this Court passed the following order:- "The present contempt petition (s) have been filed for noncompliance and disobedience of order (s) dated 10.09.2019 passed by Division Bench of this Court in CRM-M-43702-2017 and CRM-M-436772017 and terms and conditions of settlement/agreement dated 09.09.2019. As per settlement/agreement dated 09.09.2019, it was agreed by the respondents that all the property related documents would be returned and would not be misused, for which the respondents would be held responsible.

The present contempt petition (s) were filed in the year 2022 and till date, no compliance affidavit (s) has been filed by the respondents. One last opportunity is granted to do the needful, failing which cost of Rs.5,00,000/- shall be imposed upon the respondents. On his request, adjourned to 29.05.2026.

GAURAV ARORA 2026.05.30 16:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

COCP-739-2022 To be shown in the Urgent List.

A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected case."

4.

Respondent No. 2-Raj Kumar Tayal who is appearing in person made a statement that no document is left to be returned and he would be withdrawing all the complaints filed against the petitioner.

5.

In view of the statement made by respondent No. 2, order dated 10.09.2019 passed by Division Bench of this Court in CRM-M-43677-2017 has been duly complied with. Accordingly, the contempt is purged. Rule is discharged. 6.

Pending application (s) if any also stands disposed of. May 29, 2026 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) Gaurav Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No GAURAV ARORA 2026.05.30 16:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document