Promila v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-13930-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.04.2025 Promila

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Ms. G.K. Mann, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Lather, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen K. Sheoran, D.A.G., Haryana.

Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sauhard Singh, Advocate and Mr. Hardeep Mour, Advocate for the complainant.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 11.02.2025 Hisar City, District Hisar 115, 118(1), 333, 351(3) of BNS (Section 118(2) and 109(1) BNS added later on) 1.

The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking anticipatory bail.

2.

After arguing for sufficient time, counsel for the petitioner submits that since petitioner is a woman and has a child and these days, the trial Courts are not reluctant to grant bails in those cases where bail should be granted, she be permitted to file an application for regular bail straightway before this Court after surrender. 3.

Counsel for the complainant does not oppose such prayer. 4.

Given above, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 03.04.2025 Jyoti Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable:

No.

Jyoti Sharma 2025.04.09 10:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh