Narender v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM No.M-26490 of 2015 Date of Decision: September 14, 2015 Narender

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.R.S.Mamli, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Arun Kumar, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.23 dated 10.01.2015 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC and Section 61 of the Punjab Excise Act, Police Station Sadar Bhiwani, District Bhiwani. Notice of motion was issued and learned State counsel appeared and contested the petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. From the record, I find that no recovery has been effected from the present petitioner. The FIR has been registered on the basis of the secret information. The present petitioner has been nominated VINEET GULATI 2015.09.16 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM No.M-26490 of 2015 -2by the co-accused. The recovery of the illicit liquor is from the coaccused. The petitioner has already joined the investigation and he is not required for custodial interrogation. He is only to face the trial. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and without discussing the merits of the case in minute details and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case where petitioner is entitled to benefit of anticipatory bail and therefore, the present petition is accepted. The order dated 18.08.2015 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute. September 14, 2015 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE VINEET GULATI 2015.09.16 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh