Punjab State Etc. v. Sukhwinder Singh
!"#$%&#'()($* +, ,
- . , / .
!! "#$#
! % !#% &&&&
/ .0 ,
. ' ( )
*) + , # #% - ( # ) '-./'00/1 % # 2 2% % .3.+'00' 4 % 2# 2 * % *
* 2 4
2
,4 6+.+..''00' $
#2
'+.7"#-80#9.04 )
-:9 ; % % % #'0<8 2 ,4 ( *) '8'''00+# 4$ # *# 2
+8.-'00-) #
##* %%
#'0-9) 4
) *#% = # * ( *
2 # % > 2# 2 ( % % *'0<04 2
'0.''00'# * 27" < -. !# /22
( > !$ <2? +..
) 22 * -.- 3. ) )
9/ 2
# * 2# * !$ < 2? +.. -.- %
42 % 7 ) " 272 2
1 2 2
%
4 2 % 7 ( * % 2 22
@24 22 * %
'/-<
7 % 9 > # 2 %
# ) *
2 .''+'009# 2 % 7 5 * ( 2 * , ) *
2 '+.3'0084 # ( )
3
2
@
-''+ ) 4 * 2 * 7 2@ %2 22
21 * *# )
1 2 %
) # 2
2 4 2 )
%*2
2 / > #
( *) 2 * 2
2 * ( 2 * 2 ) #% # *1
2
!" # $
% &$
''( )
% * ( *
+ ++, !- ./
+ %% 0 !1- /
' 8 4% 2 2*
%@2
< A2 %
* (# ) *
) % %
% @
#
*2
+ ) ) %
%
) #
2 # ) %*
2
2#'003# , *#'003 0 ) # ) 2 2
'. % * ) * 4 5 2 > 9'
+8 ) ) %
*# 7 ** %
# % # 2
@2 .9.+'00'
* %
2
* * * % (
%
% 2 @2# * 2 2 *4
(
@2 #
@2 2 22
2 % * #* * 2 4
2
# * 2 * ( * @
-''+ ) # ( 2 2% * '' * ) 2
2
* (%
2 # % )
2 % %
* %*
) B%
2 (
*#) %
2 2%
2 )
*
* %
2% 2 @2
'+ 2.0
( 3 %'%%
%4 #1 C 2)
!"#$ %&'(
$ ) * $ $ +$
) $
'
$ * $ $ $ + , ) "& "
&-#*$ $ $* $ + ,$$ $$ , $ +
7.
It is true that the general principle is that the appellate court should not travel outside the record of the lower court and cannot take any evidence in appeal. However, as an exception, Order 41 Rule 27 CPCenables the appellate court to take additional evidence in exceptional circumstances. It may also be true that the appellate court may permit additional evidence if the conditions laid down in this Rule are found to exist and the parties are not entitled, as of right, to the admission of such evidence. However, at the same time, where the additional evidence sought to be adduced removes the cloud of doubt over the case and the evidence has a direct and important bearing on the main issue in the suit and interest of justice clearly renders it imperative that it may be allowed to be permitted on record, such application may be allowed. Even, one of the circumstances in
which the production of additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC by the appellate court is to be considered is, whether or not the appellate court requires the additional evidence so as to enable it to pronouncement judgment or for any other substantial cause of like nature.
-
. 2*)% ) /"0 1 #%# 2 * * * $ *$ , * * $ $ + '- % % #) % ) %* 2
* ) %
2 2 *5
2 2 '9 , # * , )
%
(2 %
*
.9.+'00'
) 5 *# 2
2 *,) 2 2 )
2 '3 4 * % % *2 2 '/ '8
# *# '<
, ) +..-+.+9 / . +, ,
3(4 56#"6#33#!)$*#&7)8#!9(*: #)7$ 56#"6#33#8$3"!;<# #)7$