Ranjit Singh v. Mulkh Raj

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

RSA-3313-1996 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.10.2024 RANJIT SINGH .... Appellant

VERSUS

MULKH RAJ AND ORS .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present :

None.

ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL) 1.

The present appeal pertains to the year 1996. Vide order dated 01.12.2023 fresh notice was issued to the appellant as well as respondent No.1. As per the Office report, the sole appellant has since died. None has come forward to get themselves impleaded as his legal representatives. Respondent No.1 remains unserved as he is stated to have left the given address. There is no other address available with the Court for effecting his service except the one mentioned in the memo of parties and in the judgments and decrees passed by the Courts below and is the same on which the notice was sent. 2.

In view thereof, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present appeal for non-prosecution. 3.

Dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to revive in case anything survives in the matter. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.

24.10.2024 (ALKA SARIN) Aman Jain JUDGE NOTE:

Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No AMAN JAIN 2024.10.25 09:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document