High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/27496/2016disposed of

Manoj v. State Of Haryana & ANR.

2016-10-25Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Criminal Misc. No. M-27496 of 2016 Date of decision : October 25, 2016 Manoj ....Petitioner versus State of Haryana and anr.

....Respondents Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh Present :

Mr. Sanjay Panghal, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, Addl. AG, Haryana, for the respondent Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral) The allegations against petitioner Manoj in this anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C. are that he was a signatory to a forged sale deed dated 12.4.2010.

The contentions of the learned counsel for the petitioner are that the petitioner is not a beneficiary and has only identified the parties to the document and that a compromise has been duly effected between the present complainant Vijay Kumar and principal accused-beneficiary Sandeep alias Bablu and has sought to place reliance on Annexure P/2 to hammer home the point and that the principal accused has been allowed this concession vide orders dated 13.5.2016 by the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jhajjar.

Keeping in view the principle of parity and the factual aspect which is not disputed by the learned State counsel, it would be traversity of justice to send the petitioner behind bars, the present petition is allowed. In Dalbir Singh Tiwana 2016.10.25 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

Criminal Misc. No. M-27496 of 2016 -2the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of arresting/investigating officer till submission of report under section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). The petitioner shall, however, join the investigation as and when called for and shall also abide by the conditions specified under section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. Thereafter, petitioner will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. ( Fateh Deep Singh ) October 25, 2016 Judge 'tiwana'

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No Whether Reportable ?

Yes/No Dalbir Singh Tiwana 2016.10.25 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.