Rokish Mittal v. State Of Punjab And ORS

CRM-M 26589/2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision:12.08.2015.

Rokish Mittal .............Petitioner v.

State of Punjab and others .............Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present:- Mr.Prateek Gupta,Advocate for the petitioner Jaswant Singh,J.(Oral) Petitioner and respondent no.4 are stated to be Directors of a private limited company-M/s Sarvpriya Tubes Pvt.Ltd. It is submitted that respondent no.4 has committed certain acts of omission and commission to the prejudice of the said company which amounts to fraud and embezzlement. A complaint is stated to have been filed and inquired into by SSP Fatehgarh Sahib. By referring to a Memo dated 6.5.2015(P-4) it is suggested that prima facie allegations were found to be correct, however, it was noticed that jurisdiction to complete the investigations was with SSP Patiala.

Grievance of the petitioner is that inspite of reference made in P-4, no action is being taken by the police authorities at Patiala. After hearing counsel for the petitioner, this Court does not deem it appropriate to interfere at this stage since there is no reason to RAJINDER PRASHAD JOSHI 2015.08.12 15:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh.

CRM-M 26589/2015 believe that the office of SSP Patiala or SHO concerned would not complete the investigations within a reasonable time. Dismissed as premature.

12.08.2015.

(Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge RAJINDER PRASHAD JOSHI 2015.08.12 15:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh.