Sushila Sharma v. State Of Haryana And Others

  








































































 


 



 
   

  



!"
#$
%"&'('#)*

+ + 

,-(.'/
,. 01  

 ,! !"
#$
 02 )
)%
#!."0(

   

 
*  3 4
+
,
,
           



       

   !

 "# $  %%%%% ,

+

0 /
Petition herein is, inter alia, seeking a writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondent No.2 to construct the street in Nikhar Colony, Farrukhnagar.

2.

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, he restricts his prayer for issuing time bound directions to consider and decide petitioner's representation & '  () (      #   

 *



     +( ,   - .

  /   

  

   $ 



*

 /  $ *

    

*

 

 $

     

   

 

  - .

  /    same shall be considered either way, in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties and by way of passing a speaking order,. ANKIT 2026.03.16 13:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

  







































































0 4.

Keeping in view the aforesaid stand taken by the learned counsel for respondent No.3, no further order is required to be passed and the present writ petition stands disposed of, accordingly. 5.

All the pending application(s), if any, shall also stand closed.


(HARSH BUNGER) 12.03.2026 JUDGE
 1

  /2    3 2+ 1

 * 3 2+ ANKIT 2026.03.16 13:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh