High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/27507/2016allowed

Naveen Kumar @ Neeraj v. State Of Haryana

2016-09-14Mr. Justice Harinder Singh Sidhu2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-27507 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 14, 2016 Naveen Kumar alias Neeraj

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.Vikas Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.540 dated 18.09.2014 under Sections 406, 419, 467, 468, 471, 506 and 120-B IPC registered at Police Station Sector-7, Faridabad.

Notice of motion.

On asking of the Court, Mr.Vikramjit Singh, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana, who is present in the Court, accepted notice on behalf of the respondent-State and contested the petition. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. Police record is also available.

From the record, I find that as per the FIR, a complaint was Vineet Gulati 2016.09.15 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh filed for taking action against Arun Kumar Rawat and Avneet Rawat as

CRM No.M-27507 of 2016 -2allegations regarding cheating have been levelled against them for cheating so many people. These Developers had no land for plotting nor the requisite CLU from the Government Department is in the name of company. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the present petitioner is named in the FIR. The main accused Avneet Rawat has already been granted bail by learned JMIC, Faridabad on 03.02.2016. The petitioner is in custody since 04.04.2016. He is not required for investigation or interrogation purposes. The trial of the case will take long time. No useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in custody till the disposal of the case.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal/surety bonds in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate. September 14, 2016 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Vineet Gulati 2016.09.