Sakeel v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 2024:PHHC:033090 CRR-936-2023 Date of decision: March 7th, 2024 Sakeel .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana .....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

Present:

None.

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) Case has been called twice, however, even on second call, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2.

A perusal of all the previous orders with effect from 12.04.2023 onwards reveal that either there had been no representation on behalf of the petitioner or a request for adjournment had been made. 3.

On the last date of hearing, following order was passed:- "Case has been called, however, even on second call, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners.

In the interest of justice, adjourned to 07.03.2024.

Let the Registry inform the counsel for the petitioners about the date fixed.

It is made clear that no further adjournment shall be granted.

Copy of this order be placed on the file of each of the connected cases."

4.

As per the report of Registry, counsel for the petitioner had been duly intimated about the date fixed, however, yet again there is no representation on behalf o the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter any further. PUNEET SACHDEVA 2024.03.07 13:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRR-936-2023 -25.

Dismissed for non-prosecution.

March 7th, 2024 (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2024.03.07 13:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh