Sombir @ Tinku v. State Of Haryana
Date of decision: 29th October, 2015 Sombir @ Tinku
Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
Respondent ! ! 1.
Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2.
Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.
Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present:
None for the petitioner.
Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana.
!"# $ Learned State counsel on instructions from HC Yashpal, Police Station Kosli, District Rewari, submits that the petitioner has been acquitted by the trial Court.
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Thus, in the light of submissions of learned State counsel, the present petition stands dismissed having been rendered infructuous. # !$ %&'()"
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.10.30 17:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court