Rakesh v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-26704-2017 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. Misc. No. M-26704 of 2017(O&M) Date of Decision: September 12, 2017 Rakesh ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

State of Haryana ....RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Virender Soni, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

Mr. Ashish Yadav, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 64 dated 08.02.2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379, 392, 394 of Indian Penal Code and 25 of Arms Act at Police Station Sampla, District Rohtak.

Heard.

Learned State counsel submits that petitioner has joined the investigation which is still in progress but his custodial interrogation is not required for the purpose of further investigation. In view of submission of learned State counsel but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed and the order dated 11.08.2017 is made absolute till the presentation of challan, Jyoti 2017.09.13 14:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-26704-2017 -2subject to the following terms:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against him so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) tha t the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

(iv) that the petitioner will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) September 12, 2017 JUDGE Jyoti-II Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Jyoti 2017.09.13 14:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document