Satyawan Singh And ORS v. State Of Haryana And Others

2024:PHHC:042547

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH

Sr. No.: 115 Civil Writ Petition No.7164 of 2024 Date of Decision: April 01, 2024 Satyawan Singh & others ..... PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

State of Haryana & others ..... RESPONDENT(S) . . .

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA . . .

PRESENT: - Mr. Vikram Sheoran, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.

. . .

Tribhuvan Dahiya, J (Oral) The petition has been filed seeking a writ of certiorari quashing transfer order dated 16.03.2024, Annexure P-7, as the teachers who were having lesser marks than those of the petitioners, have been allotted the stations which were opted by the petitioners. 2.

At the outset, learned State counsel, appearing on advance notice, contends that in view of discrepancies pointed out by the employees in the process of allocation of schools, the Department is having a re-look on the entire issue. Under similar circumstances, this Court has already disposed of petitions, Civil Writ Petition Nos.7012 of 2024 and 7022 of 2024, vide order dated 22.03.2024, which reads as under:

3. Learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that the discrepancies as pointed out by the petitioner(s) in these and some other cases, have been noticed and the Department is in the process of re-looking the allocation of schools in different categories. A final decision in the matter will soon be taken by considering all the AVIN KUMAR 2024.04.01 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order.

2024:PHHC:042547 CWP No.7164 of 2024 [2] grievances. The petitioner(s) can also make a representation to the respondents raising their objections which will also be looked into before a final decision is taken.

4. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) have no objection to the petitions being disposed of in terms thereof by granting liberty to the petitioner(s) to make representation(s) to the Department in this regard within ten days.

5. Ordered accordingly.

6. Further, the respondents are directed not to relieve the petitioner(s) from their present place of posting till final decision on the allocation of schools is taken after considering the objections/grievances.

3.

Accordingly, the petition is disposed of in the same terms granting liberty to the petitioners to make a representation regarding their grievance within a week which shall be duly considered and decided by the Department. And the petitioners shall not be relieved from the present place of posting till final decision on allocation of schools is taken after considering their objections/grievances.

(Tribhuvan Dahiya) Judge April 01, 2024 avin Whether Speaking/ Reasoned:

Yes/ No Whether Reportable:

Yes/ No AVIN KUMAR 2024.04.01 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order.