Shashi And ANR v. Manish And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-29557-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 02, 2015 Shashi and another .....Petitioners

Versus

Manish and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Ms.Vandana Sharma, Advocate for Mr.Rajesh Lamba, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.Vikas Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Saini, AAG, Haryana for respondent No.2.

........

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(Oral) Learned proxy counsel for the petitioners states at bar that she has the instructions to submit that the present petition has been rendered infructuous in view of the compromise effected between the parties.

Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the statement suffered by the learned counsel representing the petitioners.

So ordered.

November 02, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.11.03 14:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh