Dilawar @ Bhola v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-26811-2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-26811-2017 Date of decision: 04.08.2017 Dilawar @ Bhola ..... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ..... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. Subhash Rana, Advocate for Mr. Sanjeev Kr. Panwar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikas Chopra, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Mohan Singh Rana, Advocate for the complainant. RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) 1.

Through this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the petitioner has prayed for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 65 dated 18.01.2017 (Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 364-A and 506 read with Section 34 IPC (Section 216 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act were added later on) at Police Station Camp Palwal, District Palwal. 2.

Learned counsel for the complainant who has appeared on his own has filed his Vakalatnama in Court today and submits that the parties have entered into a compromise. He further submits that the complainant has no objection if the present petition is allowed and petitioner is released on bail.

3.

Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case; without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any Rishu Kataria 2017.08.04 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-26811-2017 -2opinion on the merits of the case, the instant petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, subject to his furnishing adequate bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

August 04, 2017 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Rishu Kataria 2017.08.04 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document