← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/26870/2014allowed

Gurgagan Singh v. State Of Haryana

2015-01-13Mr. Justice S.C. Malte2 pages

CRM-M-26870-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-26870-2014 Date of Decision: January 13, 2015 Gurgagan Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr. Sumeet Singh Brar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Kapil Aggarwal, Addl. AG, Haryana, for the respondent.

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J. (Oral) 1.

Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, Gurgagan Singh, son of Hamir Singh, resident of Kabir Basti, Ward No. 6, Dabwali, District Sirsa, who has been booked for having committed the offences punishable under Sections 148, 285, 323, 341, 452, 506 read with Section 149, IPC, and Section 25 of the Arms Act, in a case arising out of FIR No. 175, dated 31.5.2014, registered at Police Station, City, Dabwali, Mandi Dabwali, District Sirsa.

2.

Learned counsel contends that during pendency of the investigation better sense has prevailed and after resolving the dispute the petitioner has filed a petition for quashing of the PRASHANT KAPOOR 2015.01.14 10:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-26870-2014 impugned FIR and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of the compromise. Notice of motion has been issued in the said petition for 12.3.2015. He further contends that in compliance of the order dated 8.8.2014, the petitioner has joined the investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency.

3.

Learned counsel for the State on instructions from ASI Chabbil Das of Police Station, City, Dabwali, submits that in compliance of the order dated 8.8.2014, the petitioner has joined the investigation, but the pistol and the car used for committing the offence, could not be recovered.

4.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the material available on record, the present petition is allowed. The ad-interim directions issued by this Court vide order dated 8.8.2014 are made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the conditions laid down in Section 438(2), Cr.P.C. (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) January 13, 2015 JUDGE Pkapoor PRASHANT KAPOOR 2015.01.14 10:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document