Sonu v. State Of Punjab

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ......

Criminal Misc. No.M-27778 of 2018 .....

Date of decision:31.8.2018 Sonu

...Petitioner

v.

State of Punjab

...Respondent

....

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh .....

Present:

Mr. Shrey Goel, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Monika Jalota, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent-State.

Mr. N.S. Goraya, Advocate for the complainant. .....

Inderjit Singh, J.

The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.69 dated 6.5.2016 registered for the offences under Sections 323, 324, 326, 307, 506, 452, 148 and 149 IPC at Police Station Daba, District Ludhiana.

Notice of motion has been issued in this case. Ms. Monika Jalota, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab has appeared on behalf of the respondent-State and Mr. N.S. Goraya, Advocate has appeared for the complainant and contested this petition. I have heard learned counsel for the parties as well as learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab appearing for the respondent-State and HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2018.09.04 14:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Cr. Misc. No.M-27778 of 2018 [2] have gone through the record.

From the record, I find that the present petitioner is named in the FIR. He is stated to be armed with a `Datar' and injuries are also attributed to him. The challan has already been presented, but the charges have not been framed yet.

At the time of argument, it has been brought to my notice that the FIR was registered in 2016, but the petitioner could not be apprehended and he was declared proclaimed offender on 20.1.2017. Now he has surrendered before the trial Court in March 2018 as stated in the order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, I do not find it a fit case where the present petitioner is entitled to the benefit of regular bail as there is every possibility that if the bail is granted to the petitioner then he may abscond.

Therefore, finding no merit in this petition, the same is dismissed.

August 31, 2018.

(Inderjit Singh) Judge *hsp* NOTE:

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2018.09.04 14:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh