Sukhpreet Singh v. State Of Punjab
IN TH HE HIGH COURT FOR THE E STATES OF PUNJAB AND HANDIGARH HARYANA AT CH +),- -. 1230 #+# +)
### /0 0
###0 2
'
!" #$% &'" '
& Mr. & ( * / - / 0! %!1 +* ( (/2 3+ &($#
))*+) /* -, (!.1! /4 #
+),-. 5-+ +,- !
!
,&1 1
9
6/4 - +, , 8
! 8 ! ! + 2( & "
!
"
# $ $%& "
!
" $ ! ' (! ) *+, - + -!.
5 - - + +, - + +, !
! - + + , , .
.-! . ! 5 . *
!.-. +* - 5 - - * + * , -- + '*0 + .
! + 0
.- - +
'*0 0
++ * * .
.
. , * -!.
. 0 0 .- $ +. -!
!. 1*+ ++ -! . ,*!
!. +!1$ ' ,3 -! :0* *0 0 *,!;* +, ,-! ! + + -!. * * -- -! -!+ !
' ! .- ++ ( -,/ 0!2 3+ + -+,+. .,.- -,+
-!. * *,.-! $ - + + .
$0 ! -! + 0 .- ! !
"
< 0 + !
+, ! - 0- - +, . -! !
!
- !.-!.
. $ . ! - .-
4
.. ++9 * * ! 9-! .
= /. -! ! * !-> >. - +, 0
! ++* -* * !0 + +!1 0
!
-!. .
/+- * + -+!-!. !
--! - +!
*!! .* -0,
! + 4!
- + !
! *! * 0 -0 ! 7 % ! !+- ! -Rohi it Kumar Vs. State of Delhi : 20 008 Crl. J. 2561. - .0-! ! * -!.*4! ,
9 ! --!+
*!. - * , ,? .!--!+ '! .
. * ! 0 -0 ! 7
- *! -! . ,9 +0 !! . -+ !-! .*!. , %!
! +-! -Gurappa Gugal and other rs Vs. State of Mysore : 1969 Cr riLJ 826 and S 339. Shokat Ali Vs. State of Haryn na : 2020(2) RCR (Criminal) 3 , vi ide order dated 23.11.2023, whil le adjourning the case to 20.01.2 to complet te the mandatory period of 30 d days, the learned trial Court faile ed to
consider th he fact that ! 04 .+,.-, 3 ! -!.*9 +-+ !- +* !-+!-! . -! -
* * , %!
! !4 ! + .
!"# $ $$ # / - . 0 -! ! 0 -!.*
0.!-!-!
! * 0*!- *-- + / - ! 6 7 -+! -!.+ -+!, .!-!-! *0*! !! , @ . + 4 . !-! -. *!!! , .!-!-! !*0 !-, -!.+4 .!-!- 5+ !67 6!7 7 ! 6 767
!3 !0 3!0 *! .* +0 0 -+! -!. . -+! -0
% ! !+- ! -Pawan Kumar Gupta a Vs.
of W.B. : 1973 CriLJ 1368. The State
/!! , 0*
!. +0 0* * * +0! - - * .-
6/4 - +, 8 ! 8 !! +2(& "
!
"
# $ $% & "
) !
" $! ' ( (! ) *+, - + -!.
9 * !9 -! .
A-0*! - ,3 -!
! *!* +0, ,-- ,!! !
! + *- *1.
. , .
. + +3 !- ;,+ !
5 --! - + .,
$. !! ---+
*-
. -+ .
. + .
.
'*0 + + +3! -,. ! % ;
+ - +,- *(!) 0 0! /, ) ) (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE #+#+)
Whet ther speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whet ther reportable Yes/No