M/S Bright Vijaywargi Jv v. Union Of India And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.7802 of 2020 Date of Decision: June 05, 2020 M/s Bright-Vijaywargi (JV)

...Petitioner

VERSUS

Union of India and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI

Present:

Mr.Sandeep Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Sourabh Goel, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2.

Mr.Ankur Mittal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana for respondents No.3 and 4.

**** JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J.

The matter has been taken up through video-conferencing in the light of the pandemic Covid-19 situation and as per instructions. This writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for the issuance of a writ, in the nature of mandamus for directing the respondents to issue password to the petitioner against the provisional ID for TIN 06461950758 allotted to it so that it can migrate itself from VAT to GST regime and also to issue GST Registration Certificate which has not been done till date despite the fact of having sent various E-mails and letters to various authorities etc. VINEET GULATI 2020.06.09 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CWP No.7802 of 2020 -2Learned counsel for the petitioner states that at this stage he would be satisfied, if a direction is issued to respondent No.2-Goods and Service Tax Network, to consider and decide the E-mail (Annexure P-13) expeditiously.

Heard.

Notice of motion. Mr.Sourabh Goel, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 and 2 and and Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl. A.G., Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.3 and 4. In view of the above, without adverting to the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2Goods and Service Tax Network to consider and decide the E-mail (Annexure P-13) in accordance with law within six weeks from the receipt of the certified copy of the judgment. In case, on consideration, the competent authority reaches to the conclusion that the relief sought by the petitioner is admissible to it, in such eventuality, the consequential relief be allowed to it. However, in case, any deficiency is noticed in the documents, before rejecting the case of the petitioner, it be afforded an opportunity of hearing.

Disposed of accordingly.

(JITENDRA CHAUHAN) (ARCHANA PURI) JUDGE JUDGE June 05, 2020 Vgulati Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No VINEET GULATI 2020.06.09 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh