Puneet & ORS v. State Of Haryana

   

  

 


  
  !"





   

   

 

      

#  $%  &  &     !!

 

"#        !$"%%&'
"(   ))))  & '     * " + !  , # # ' 

     Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity, 'Cr.P.C.') for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.45, dated 16.01.2017, registered at Police Stati -%

(% 

  (%     

.//012    '3 Notice of motion has been issued in this case. Mr. P.K.Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana, has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and contested this petition. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned State counsel and have gone through the record. The petitioners have already joined the investigation. They are not required for custodial interrogation. Nothing is to be recovered from them. No useful purpose will be served by sending them to custody. Rajesh Kumar 2017.02.15 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.

Chandigarh


  
  !"


 Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case; without discussing the facts of the case in minute details and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find merit in this petition and the same is allowed. The order dated 27.01.2017, granting interim bail to the petitioners, is made absolute. However, the petitioners shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so and shall abide by the conditions of Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

  & "

4 55   

6 5

%7   8

6 ' 9 Rajesh Kumar 2017.02.15 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.

Chandigarh