M/S Radha Steel Rolling Mills v. Pb. State Electricity Board

2024:PHHC:043941

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH RSA-962-1996 (O&M) Date of Decision : 02.04.2024 M/S RADHA STEEL ROLLING MILLS .... Appellant

VERSUS

PB. STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS .... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present :

Mr. Dishant Jindal, Advocate for Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate for the appellant Mr. P.S. Brar, Advocate for the respondents.

Ms. Jyoti Kaur, Advocate for Mr. M.S. Longia, Advocate for the respondents. ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL) 1.

The present appeal pertains to the year 1996. Vide order dated 06.12.2023 notice was issued to the appellant as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant had stated that he was unable to establish contact with the appellant.

2.

As per the Office report, notice issued to the appellant has been received back unserved with the report that the appellant-company has shut down long ago. There is no other address available with the Court for effecting service of the appellant except the one mentioned in the memo of parties and in the judgments and decrees passed by the Trial Court and the First Appellate Court and is the same on which the notice was sent. Today again learned counsel for the appellant states that he has not been able to establish contact with the appellant.

AMAN JAIN 2024.04.02 21:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order.

2024:PHHC:043941 RSA-962-1996 (O&M) -23.

In view thereof, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present appeal for non-prosecution. 4.

Dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to revive in case anything survives. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. 02.04.2024 (ALKA SARIN) Aman Jain JUDGE NOTE:

Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No AMAN JAIN 2024.04.02 21:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order.