Nitu Yadav And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others

CWP No. 7817 of 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 7817 of 2020 DATE OF DECISION :- June 08, 2020 Nitu Yadav and another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Mr. Jasbir Mor, Advocate for the petitioners. *** (The case has been taken up through Video Conferencing) Petitioners Nitu Yadav and Kuldeep Singh both working as JBT teachers at Government Primary School, Bagpat, Block Chhachhrauli, District Yamuna Nagar have brought the instant Civil Writ Petition against the respondents State of Haryana through Additional Chief Secretary to Govt. of Haryana, School Education Department, Civil Sectt.

Chandigarh, Director of Elementary Education, Haryana, Shiksha Sadan, Sector 5, Panchkula, District Elementary Education Officer, Yamuna Nagar, District Elementary Education Officer, Gurugram and District Elementary Education Officer, Charkhi Dadri craving for issuance of an appropriate order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to allot Gurugram and Bhiwani/Charkhi Dadri Districts permanently respectively to the petitioners of their choice for the post of Primary teacher since the candidates lower in merits to the petitioners have been allotted PARVINDER SINGH 2020.06.

CWP No. 7817 of 2020 those districts by ignoring claim of the petitioners. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioners and going through the record, it transpires that the petitioners have submitted written representations (Annexures P/10 and P/11) respectively to Director of Elementary Education, Haryana, Panchkula both dated 12.3.2020 expressing their grievances in that regard, which representations are not shown to have been disposed of by the said authority till date. It shall be proper and appropriate if the matter is dealt with at departmental level first, to avoid unnecessary litigation. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider and decide the representations (Annexures P/10 and P/11) of the petitioners by passing speaking orders within a period of two months from today. The petitioners may approach the Court again, if need be in accordance with law, if they still feel aggrieved by the orders passed on their representations by the competent authority.

(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE June 08, 2020 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARVINDER SINGH 2020.06.08 14:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh