Surmukh Singh v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 27040 of 2017 DATE OF DECISION :- September 08, 2017 Surmukh Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Mr. Har Naresh Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Aulakh, DAG, Punjab.

*** Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner and his wife have since appeared in the enquiry and their statements have been recorded. This fact is conceded by the learned State counsel, on instruction from ASI Ranjit Singh, Economic Wing, Ropar. He further submits that enquiry is still going on. The State counsel further submits that if petitioner or his wife are required to join enquiry, they would be summoned by adopting due process by issuing notice to them giving them sufficient time to appear in the enquiry.

Hearing this statement, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he be permitted to withdraw the petition. Dismissed as withdrawn.

(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE September 08, 2017 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Parvinder Singh 2017.09.12 15:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh