Mohd. Akbar @ Soni And ANR v. State Of Punjab And ORS
Date of decision: 12th August, 2015 Mohd. Akbar @ Soni and another
Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
Respondents ! ! 1.
Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2.
Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.
Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present:
Mr. G.N. Malik, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. C.S. Brar, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.1.
Mr. Mohd. Imran, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 5.
!"# $ Report dated 04.09.2014 of learned Addl. Civil Judge (Sr.Divn.)7cum7Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Malerkotla has been received whereby after recording statements of LRs of complainant Paramjit Kaur (since deceased) namely Baljit Kaur, Mandip Kaur, Ramandeep Kaur (minor) and Gursewak Singh (minor) and the accused persons namely Mohd. Akbar @ Soni and Mohammad Amjad @ Naag, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise has RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.08.17 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court
been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure.
Heard.
It has been brought to the notice of this Court that instant FIR against the similarly placed co7accused has already been quashed vide orders dated 24.03.2014 of this Court. In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, the fact that parties belong to the same very area and the offences for which the accused have been hauled up are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out differences and in bringing about peace and harmony and in view of the law laid down in %&'( !&()* + !,',- .(/'0 '(1 '(,*-2 # $ #2&3&('4$ 5 6 and %7.48&(1-2 !&()* '(1 ,*-29 + !,',- .(/'0 '(1 '(,*-2 #6$ #2&3&('4$ 5" the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.141 dated 21.08.2008 registered at Police Station City Malerkotla, District Sangrur under Sections 323/427/452/506/379/148/149 IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR are quashed qua the present petitioners.
The petition stands allowed in those terms.
# !$ .).9,"5 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.08.17 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court