Sunil v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-27045-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision:-4.12.2019 SUNIL ... Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL Present:- Mr. R.S. Panghal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Aditi Girdhar, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Balraj Gujjar, Advocate for respondent No.2.

GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. (Oral) Today at the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has informed that when this petition was filed, the main case i.e. an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was still pending which has now been finally decided and that in these circumstances, the present petition is rendered infructuous and may be dismissed as such.

In view of the aforesaid submission the petition is dismissed having been rendered infructuous. Needless to mention that it shall be open to the parties to seek compliance of order passed under Section 125 Cr.P.C. provided the same has not been stayed by this Court. ( GURVINDER SINGH GILL) 4.12.2019 JUDGE Gaurav Sorot Whether reasoned / speaking?

Yes / No Whether reportable?

Yes / No GAURAV SOROT 2019.12.04 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document