High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/27924/2016disposed of

Parveen v. State Of Punjab & ORS.

2017-02-14Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg2 pages

CRM-M-27924-2016 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-27924-2016 Date of Decision:- 14.02.2017 Parveen ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Gautam Kaile, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Jaspreet Singh Sekhon, AAG, Punjab.

**** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Petitioner is seeking directions to respondent No.2 to protect her life and liberty at the instance of respondent Nos.3 to 7. Learned State counsel has filed reply by way of affidavit of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Zira, District Ferozepur, on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2, today in the Court and the same is taken on record. As per reply, respondent Nos.3 to 7 have not raided the house of the petitioner on 29.06.2016 nor misbehaved with her or her family members. Moreover, the petitioner is not required by the answering respondents in any case nor police has ever raided her house. In view of above-said facts, no further action is required to be taken in the present petition and the same is hereby stands disposed of Naresh Kumar 2017.02.16 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh accordingly.

CRM-M-27924-2016 -2However, in case, the petitioner is require by the police in any complaint/enquiry, she will be given seven days prior notice, in accordance with law.

February 14, 2017 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Naresh Kumar 2017.02.16 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh