Surjeet Kumar And ANR v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-18531-2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-18531-2022 Date of decision: 23.03.2022 Surjeet Kumar & another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:- Mr. Ritesh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.

Dated Police Station Sections 06.09.2018 City Ballabhgarh, 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506, 120-B IPC District Faridabad 1.

The petitioners apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above have come up before this Court under Section 438 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail. 2.

Vide order dated 12.05.2021, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court had granted interim bail to the petitioner subject to their joining investigation. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pursuant to order dated 12.05.2021, the petitioners have joined the investigation and their custodial interrogation is no more required.

4.

Learned counsel for the State on instructions from the investigating officer does not dispute the fact that the petitioners have joined the investigation and their custodial interrogation is no more required.

5.

Given above, the present petition is allowed and interim order dated 12.05.2021 is made absolute, subject to following additional conditions:- i) The petitioners shall surrender all weapons, firearms, ammunition, if any, along with the arms license to the concerned authority within 10 days from today and inform the Investigator about the ASHWANI KUMAR 2022.03.23 15:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-18531-2022 compliance. However, subject to the Indian Arms Act, 1959, the petitioners shall be entitled to renew and take it back in case of acquittal in this case.

iii) The petitioners shall disclose details of all assets, held either individually or jointly, including bank balances, fixed deposits, DEMAT accounts, to the investigator and its copy to the complainant/victim(s) within ten days.

6.

There would be no need for a certified copy of this order for furnishing bonds, and any Advocate for the petitioners can download this order along with case status from the official web page of this Court and attest it to be a true copy. In case the attesting officer wants to verify the authenticity, such an officer can also verify its authenticity and may download and use the downloaded copy for attesting bonds. Petition is allowed to the extent mentioned above. All pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE March 23, 2022 AK Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No.

ASHWANI KUMAR 2022.03.23 15:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document