Tarsem Kaur & ANR v. State Of Punjab & ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-27153-2014 Date of Decision: December 1, 2015 Tarsem Kaur and another ......Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr.M.S.Chauhan, Advocate for Mr.R.S.Bains, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.P.S.Paul, DAG, Punjab, for respondent No.1.

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Learned proxy counsel for the petitioners submits that he has the instructions to state at Bar that the complaint subject matter of the present petition has been dismissed by learned trial Court and, as such, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.

Ordered accordingly.

December 1, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.12.02 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh