Raj Kumar And Others v. State Of Haryana And Others
-1-
!"
# !
$!! ! !%!
& %'' ( )* * *
./
./.
!
"
# .
!
-2- .
$ )
!"
% )0
!&
!
)
!
"
'
).
!
! !
( .)
"
-3- .
& &!
.0)
&
&
)
!
! &!
# .
)/
!
!,(
1"2 ,
3 4 %!
)))))
+,- *./01+2 * 34 25/, 4 6/*,0 1+"8 / .%#4%'4%'#4%'4 %'$4%'$'4%'%4%'%%444#4'/6((+2 "8 9#(9(.
-4- *.+2
7/,34 25/, 4 6/*,0 1+"8 9$%9((. *.!5+
,. :34 25/, 4 6/*,0 1+"8 9'9((. *. 0;3 54 223. . .*<+. *...:
*/14 25/, 4 *. .
.. =0/+4 25/, 4+2 .5+
,;*4 25/, 46/* .>,1<3+4 25/, 4 6/** 7/+2 +,/. /;+,+, *34*<+. 4 %! *
!2-*
01 /*2 * 033 21 7/ /6 ,0 :/5 ?
+,1/+ 2 >*1, ,1,1/+ 1+ ,0 <1+5/35 /??/+@;
,1/+/63>. 0 6, 1+:*1 640/> *4* * ** 26*/?"8 9%#9 ((,1,3 2 A B;?*+2/,0 * .,, /6*<++2/,0 * .C
*< *?2 1+,0
,1,1/+ 1 6/*
=1+D@; 01+D /63 */62166 > 33 3 *2, 2(.(.(% ++ E;* 1+ "8 9%#9(( 7 2 :< * 7/+2 +, /.9+D1+
*91+9"01 64 !**1D,1/++28, *
/;* 7*,?
+,4*<+4>0 :<,0 3 D*+, 23/+DD/41+''$ ! , F(( !!+2 +2*2 ,1?
1+ (# 2;*1+D *51 , +;* 4 ,/ ,0 7 * 0 1+ 0 :
+ /*2 2,/:
>1,02*>+6, *,0 1** ,1* ?
+,1D+/*1+D,0 ?, *136, /+ * /*2 +2 6, * 773<1+D ;3 1+ , 2 /6 ;3 /6 ,0 *<+"1513 *51
;3 4''.
-5- # !, 1 ;:?1,, 2 ,0, ,0 > +/ ?1 * 7*
+,,1/+ /+ 3?
+,/*6*;2/+,0 7*,/6,0 * 1+D*+,/6 ,/,0 ?4 < ,4,0 1?7;D+ 2/*2 * 05 :
+7 26, *0;D 2 3<.0 ,1/+/6
,1+D* /5 *<1 51/3,15 /6B;2D?
+,/6,0 /+C:3 ;7* ?
"/;*, 1+ ,0 ?,, * /6
!""!!#. !,0 :
+6;*,0 * ;:?1,, 2:<,0 /;+ 377 *1+D/+ :
036/6,0 ,0,+;?:
*/6>*1,7 ,1,1/+ 1+5/351+D 1?13* /+,*/5 * <4 1 1+5/35 2 1+ ,0 7*
+, , /6 >*1, 7 ,1,1/+ 4 > 12 21+3 2 "$ # %
& '(&
)*
"$+!!
#& '(
)*
C +2,0 ,1,1/+ > 33/> 2:<,01 "/;*,512 B;2D?
2 #.(%.(.0 122 1 1/+ > ;:B ,?,, */6033 +D 1+,0 , -
& ,- $!.+
+ & ' )*
(
C+2/,0 */++ , 2 & * , +, 3 . ;:?1, ,0, 512 /*2 * 2, 2 (.(.( 7 2:<,0 /+C:3 151 1/+
+0/6,01 "/;*,4,0 6/* 12&
05 :
+21 ?1 2. ;:?1, ,0,,0 /6,0 * 1+,0 7*
+, ,/6>*1,7 ,1,1/+ 1 @;* 3</5 2:<,0 6/* 122 1 1/+ 2, 2(.(.(7 21+6/* 12&
+2,0 6/* 4,0 7*
+,>*1, ,1,1/+ ?<:
21 7/ 2/61+, *? ,0 /6.
-6- $ & *+ 2 ,, /;+ 3 does not dispute that the ratio of judgment in the matter of ,- $!.+
+ & ' )*
(
C+2/,0 */++ , 2 & * , +, 3 2 12 2 512 /*2 * 2, 2 (.(.( would be applicable to the case of the petitioners in the present batch of writ petitions. %
/*21+D3<4 >1,0 ,0 /+ +, /6 ,0 7*,1 +2 >1,0/;, /??
+,1+D;7/+,0 ?
*1, /6,0 4,0 7*
+,:,0/67 ,1,1/+ 1 21 7/ 2/61+, *? /6,0 B;2D?
2(.(.(7 21+,- $!.+
+& ')*
(
C(supra).*2 * * D*21+D>1,02*>3/6 +2* /5 *< 6*/?,0 * 0 1+1+,0 * ,15 ,1,1/+ * , 12 .
+21+D ?1 . 7731,1/+ 4 16 +<4 033 3 / ,+2 21 7/ 2/6/*21+D3<. '
70/,//7</6,0 /*2 *:
73 2/+,0 /++ , 2613 . )8
+4 %! -
% ,0 * 7 =1+D* /+ 2-
/ ,0 ** 7/*,:3 -
/