Smt.Sudesh Kumari v. Nanak Singh Etc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH

Sr. No.: 306 FAO No.3171 of 1996 Date of Decision: March 06, 2020 Sudesh Kumari ..... APPELLANT

VERSUS

Nanak Singh & others ..... RESPONDENT(S) . . .

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANT PARKASH . . .

PRESENT: - None for the appellant.

None for respondent Nos.1 and 2.

Mr. Neeraj Khanna, Advocate, for respondent No.3 - Insurance Company.

. . .

Sant Parkash, J (Oral) As per the office report, service is not complete as appellant and private respondents are not residing at the given address. It appears that the appellants are not interested in pursuing the matter.

Dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Sant Parkash) Judge March 06, 2020 avin Whether Speaking/ Reasoned:

Yes/ No Whether Reportable:

Yes/ No AVIN KUMAR 2020.03.06 15:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document