Ankur Mittal v. State Of Punjab & ANR.




    
       Date of decision: 10th September, 2015  Ankur Mittal

Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another

Respondents        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. K.S. Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. C.S. Brar, Dy. Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.1.

Mr. Ashish Bansal, Advocate for respondent No.2.

 !
"#  $ Report dated 01.09.2015 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Talwandi Sabo has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Davinder Kumar and the accused Ankur Mittal, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure.

Heard.

In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, being a pure money dispute the fact that parties belong to the same very area RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.11 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



    and the offences for which the accused has been hauled up are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in view of the law laid down in %&'(!&()*+!,',- .(/'0 '(1 '(,*-2  #3$   #2&4&('5$ 36 and %7.58&(1-2 !&()* '(1 ,*-29 + !,',-  .(/'0 '(1 '(,*-2 

 #6$   #2&4&('5$ 

" the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.31 dated 26.03.2015 registered at Police Station Raman, District Bathinda under Section 420 IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR are quashed. The petition stands allowed in those terms.

#  !
$   !-:,-40-2 "  
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.11 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court