Jaswinder Singh v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M-27212-2015 (O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-27212-2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 12, 2015 Jaswinder Singh .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr.Harshit Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.K.S.Pannu, DAG, Punjab.

Mr.A.S.Salar, Advocate for the informant.

........

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(Oral) It is inter alia contended that as per enquiry report Annexure P-3, conducted by SHO, Police Station, Sadar, Dhuri, District Sangrur, and on the basis of statements of Security Guards, who remained posted at the gate of college, Section 452, IPC, and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, 1959, have been deleted.

MEENU 2015.10.14 11:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-27212-2015 (O&M) -2Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Sukhdev Singh, Police Station, Sadar Dhuri, District Sangrur, submits that in compliance of the interim directions issued vide order, dated 24.08.2015, the petitioner has joined the investigation. However, the names of the co-accused were not disclosed by him. He further submits that as per direction of Senior Superintendent of Police, Section 452 IPC has not been deleted.

Learned counsel for the informant-complainant has opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner on the premise that the Investigating Agency has failed to recover the weapons used for causing injuries to the aggrieved persons. The petitioner has joined the investigation. On the ground that petitioner has failed to disclose the names of his coaccused, the bail cannot be declined on this sole score. Other factors are in favour of the petitioner. Therefore, interim directions issued vide order dated 24.08.2015 are made absolute. Petitioner shall continue to join the investigation as and when required to do so and abide by all the conditions laid down under Section 438(2), Cr.P.C.

October 12, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.10.14 11:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh