Jagdeep Singh Alias Bobby v. State Of Punjab

Crl. Misc. No. M-28145 of 2016 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-28145 of 2016 Date of Decision: 09.12.2016 Jagdeep Singh @ Bobby ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. V.P.S.Sidhu, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. Dheeraj Mahajan, Advocate for the complainant.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J (ORAL) Through the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 21 dated 3.7.2016, registered under Sections 354-A IPC read with Section 8 of the POCSO Act, Police Station Dorangala, Tehsil and District Gurdapur.

Counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to the order dated 5.9.2016, passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation. State counsel states that the petitioner has joined the investigation.

Counsel for the complainant states that two other FIRs are against the petitioner.

Counsel for the petitioner states that both the trials had ended Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.12.09 14:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-28145 of 2016 -2in acquittal on 7.10.2015.

Looking to the circumstances, but without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed and order dated 5.9.2016 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438 Sub Section 2 Clauses (i)(ii) and (iii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with the rider that the petitioner will not contact the complainant or tamper with evidence.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE December 09, 2016 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2016.12.09 14:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh