Rakesh Kumar Alias Bunti v. Baini Masih And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CR-1606-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision : 29.10.2025 Rakesh Kumar @ Bunti ... Petitioner

Versus

Baini Masih and Others ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present :

Mr. Arvind Kashyap, Advocate for the petitioner. Respondent No.1 proceeded against ex parte vide order dated 07.11.2024.

None for respondent No.2.

Ms. Tanu, Advocate for Mr. Nigam K. Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent No.3. ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral) 1.

Learned counsel for respondent No.3 states that the cheque has been deposited before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Pathankot. 2.

In view of the statement made by learned counsel for respondent No.3, the present revision petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. 3.

Needless to say, the petitioner would always be at liberty to get the present revision petition revived in case anything survives in the matter. 29.10.2025 Ankur Goyal ( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO ANKUR GOYAL 2025.10.30 08:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment