← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/27311/2017allowed

Jasvir Kaur v. State Of Punjab

2017-10-25Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CRM-M-27311-2017 & 31497-2017 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

(1) Crl. Misc. No.M-27311 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 25, 2017 Jasvir Kaur ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

State of Punjab ....RESPONDENT(s).

(2) Crl. Misc. No.M-31497 of 2017 (O&M) Shivharpal Singh ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

State of Punjab ....RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Avtar Singh Bhatti, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

Mr. C.L. Pawar, Sr. D.A.G. Punjab.

Complainant in person.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) Both the aforementioned petitions have been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.100 dated 04.07.2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420 read with Section 120-B of Indian Penal Code, at Police Station City Kotkapura, District Faridkot. Heard.

Sachin Mehta 2017.10.25 17:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

CRM-M-27311-2017 & 31497-2017 -2Learned State counsel submits that petitioners have joined the investigation, which is still in progress but their custodial interrogation is not required for the purpose of further investigation. In view of submission of learned State counsel but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, both the petitions are allowed. Order dated 31.07.2017 passed in CRM-M-27311-2017 and order dated 19.09.2017 passed in CRM-M-31497-2017 are made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:- (i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that the petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against them so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

(iv) that the petitioners will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court, which the trial Court will decide on the basis of evidence collected during investigation.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) October 25, 2017 JUDGE Sachin M.

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Sachin Mehta 2017.10.25 17:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh