High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/27493/2015allowed

Rajbir v. State Of Haryana

2015-08-24Mr. Justice Harinder Singh Sidhu2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM No.M-27493 of 2015 Date of Decision: August 24, 2015 Rajbir

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.Harsh Kinra, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.41 dated 01.07.2015 under Sections 420, 120-B IPC, Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act and Section 13(1) D of the P.C. Act, registered at Police Station S.V.B. (H), Rohtak.

Notice of motion.

Mr.Anmol Malik, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and contests the petition.

Police record is also available.

As per prosecution version, the present petitioner is Munim of Mahesh Kumar Madan and allegation is that the depot holders in connivance with Mahesh Kumar Madan, who is supplier of VINEET GULATI 2015.08.26 11:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM No.M-27493 of 2015 -2kerosene oil and Rajbir Nain, Inspector Food and Civil Supplies, are selling the kerosene oil in black instead of distributing the same. The present petitioner was apprehended while getting signatures of the depot holders on the receipt without supplying the kerosene oil. The petitioner is in custody since 01.07.2015. He is not required for investigation or interrogation purposes nor anything is to be recovered from him as he is in judicial custody. The presentation of challan and trial of the case will take long time. No useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in custody till the disposal of the case.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and without discussing the merits of the case in minute details and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is accepted and the petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bonds in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Duty Magistrate, Rohtak.

August 24, 2015 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE VINEET GULATI 2015.08.26 11:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh