Rishi Verma And ANR v. Ut Of Chandigarh And ANR




    
      Date of decision: 30th October, 2015  Rishi Verma and another  Petitioners

Versus

UT Chandigarh and another  Respondents        
  
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Rishu Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioners.

Ms. Ashima Mor, APP UT Chandigarh, for respondent No.1.

None for respondent No.2.

 
!"

# Report dated 22.09.2015 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Chandigarh has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Shivani Verma as well as the accused persons namely Rishi Verma and Chander Kanta, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure.

Heard.

RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.11.02 14:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



    In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, being a pure matrimonial case together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in view of the law laid down in $%&' %'()* +&+,

-'.&/ &'0 &'+),1   "2#   "1%3%'&4# 25 and $6-47%'0,1 %'() &'0 +),18 * +&+,  -'.&/ &'0 &'+),1   "5#   "1%3%'&4# ! the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.193 dated 20.06.2014 registered at Police Station Sector 31, Chandigarh under Sections 406/498A IPC and all consequences arising out of the said FIR are quashed. The petition stands allowed in those terms.

"

 
#   9+/,15! 
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.11.02 14:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court