Sunil Kumar v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M No. 27627 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 2.2.2018 ...

Sunil Kumar ................Petitioner vs.

State of Haryana .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan Present: Mr. Johan Kumar, Advocate the petitioner Mr. Neeraj Poswal, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana ...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner has since deposited a sum of Rs. 1 lac. A photocopy of the receipt has been placed on the file. This fact is conceded by the learned State counsel, on instructions from SI Jagbir Singh. He further states that the petitioner is not required by the police for further investigation. In these circumstances, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 11.8.2017 is made absolute, subject to fulfillment of conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petition in that way is allowed.

( H.S. Madaan ) Judge 2.2.2018 chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No Banita Chugh 2018.02.02 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh