High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/28572/2018allowed

Arshdeep Singh v. State Of Punjab

2018-08-21Mr. Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri2 pages

CRM-M-28572-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-28572-2018 Date of decision: 21.08.2018 Arshdeep Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Karanjit Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Seena Mand, DAG, Punjab.

**** JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL) This is a petition that has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 198 dated 28.08.2015 under Sections 376-D/506 of IPC and Section 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, registered at Police Station Jandiala Guru Amritsar, District Amritsar Rural. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner would contend that the petitioner has been in custody since 14.11.2017 while submitting that the trial is likely to take some time to conclude and the material witness, namely the complainant has been examined. In this background, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner. Ms. Seena Mand, learned DAG, Punjab opposed the grant of regular bail while submitting that the allegations against the petitioner Satyawan 2018.08.21 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-28572-2018 herein are serious in nature.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties. In view of the fact that the petitioner herein has been incarcerated since 14.11.2017 and the trial is likely to take some time to conclude and the material has been examined, the present petition is allowed. Without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, concerned subject to following terms:- (i) The petitioner shall comply with the conditions mentioned in Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

(ii) In the event of his absence on any date of hearing, the benefit of bail allowed to the petitioner shall stand withdrawn. The trial Court shall be competent to cancel his bail bond and surety bond and proceed to procure his presence in accordance with law. In that eventuality the accused shall have to apply for bail afresh before the trial Court.

(iii) He shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the Court.

21.08.2018 (JAISHREE THAKUR) Satyawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes.

Whether reportable No.

Satyawan 2018.08.21 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh