Pushpa Tanwar v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-14906 of 2020 (O&M) Date of Decision:03.09.2020 Pushpa Tanwar

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA Present :

Mr. S. R. Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Bhupender Singh, DAG, Haryana.

(Presence marked through video conference).

ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL) This is a petition for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.42 dated 26.02.2020, under Sections 406, 409, 420 of IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to order dated 12.06.2020, the petitioner has joined the investigation and has fully cooperated in the same.

3.

Learned State counsel does not controvert the fact that the petitioner has joined the investigation. He submits that, per his instructions, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is no more required. 4.

In view of the above, since custodial interrogation of the petitioner is no more required and she has already joined the investigation and cooperated with the investigating officer, the petition is allowed. Order dated 12.06.2020 granting interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner is made absolute, subject to the petitioner's complying with provisions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(ARUN MONGA) SEPTEMBER 03, 2020 JUDGE vandana Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No SONU 2020.09.04 09:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document