Jagmohan v. State Of Haryana And ORS.

CRM-M-27687-2015 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-27687-2015 Date of Decision: December 8, 2015 Jagmohan ......Petitioner

Versus

The State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr.Jitender Nara, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Saini, AAG, Haryana for respondent Nos.1 to 3.

Ms.Sambodhi Kasni, Advocate for Mr.K.S.Dhaliwal, Advocate for respondent No.4.

Mr.S.P.Chahar, Advocate for respondent No.5.

Mr.Sanjiv Pabbi, Advocate for respondent No.6.

....

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Kuldeep Singh, Police Station, Sadar, Rohtak, District Rohtak, submits that the investigation of the case in hand has been entrusted to the Missing Cell and as soon as the investigation is MEENU 2015.12.09 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M-27687-2015 -2complete, the report would be submitted before the learned Area Judicial Magistrate, in accordance with law.

In view of the above learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition, at this stage.

Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the above prayer.

Ordered accordingly.

December 8, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.12.09 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh