Sonia And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH.
CRWP-2879-2024 Date of Decision:02.04.2024
....Petitioners
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARAMJIT SINGH
Present:
Mr. Sunil Kumar Tandon, Advocate for the petitioners.
******* KARAMJIT SINGH, J.(Oral) Petitioners are praying for direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to provide protection to their life and liberty from the hands of private respondents No.4 to 6.
2.
In the petition, it has been stated that both the petitioners are into live-in-relationship which has been opposed by private respondents No.4 to 6 who are related to petitioner No.1. 3.
Counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1 a girl is more than 18 years of age and is into live-in-relationship with petitioner No.2 a boy aged about twenty and a half years and the relationship is opposed by respondents No.4 to 6, who are extending threats to cause harm to the petitioners and in this regard petitioners have given representation dated 27.03.2024 (Annexure P-3) to respondent No.2 i.e. Superintendent of Police, Yamuna Nagar but the police authorities failed to take necessary action in this regard. 4.
Notice of motion.
5.
Mr. Neeraj Sheoran, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf Priyanka Thakur 2024.04.02 19:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document of respondents No. 1 to 3 and submits that in case any representation is
CRWP-2879-2024 :2:
2024:PHHC:043403 pending the concerned authority will look into the matter and take action in accordance with law.
6.
In view of above, without going into the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 i.e. Superintendent of Police, Yamuna Nagar to consider representation dated 27.03.2024 (Annexure P-3) and to take action if so warranted in accordance with law in case there is any threat perception to the petitioners.
7.
However, any observations made in this order will not be construed as an expression of opinion on the validity of the relationship of the petitioners. It is also made clear that respondents No.4 to 6 are at liberty to avail appropriate remedy available to them under law against the petitioners. In case the petitioners have committed any offence, law will take its own course.
(KARAMJIT SINGH) JUDGE Priyanka Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Priyanka Thakur 2024.04.02 19:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document