High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/27861/2017allowed

Aakash v. State Of Haryana

2017-08-08Mr. Justice Harinder Singh Sidhu2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-27861 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 08, 2017 Aakash

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.Rakesh Dhiman, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.220 dated 15.08.2015 under Sections 302, 201, 120-B and 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Linepar Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar.

Notice of motion.

Mr.B.S.Virk, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and contested the petition. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. From the record, I find that as per the prosecution version, earlier DDR was got recorded on the statement of Ravi Kumar, who stated that on 10.08.2015, his father Joginder had gone from the house to do Vineet Gulati 2017.08.09 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh labour work but did not return home. On search, his dead body was found

CRM No.M-27861 of 2017 -2in the drain on 13.08.2015. It is in the statement that nobody is responsible for the same, nor he want to take any legal action against anyone. His father had fallen in the drain under the influence of alcohol. After two months, Suman, daughter of deceased got recorded her statement by stating that his father had a fight with the present petitioner etc. The present petitioner has been in custody since 29.10.2015. He is not required for any investigation or interrogation purposes as he is in judicial custody. The trial of the case will take long time. No useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in custody till disposal of the case.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal/surety bonds in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate. August 08, 2017 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Vineet Gulati 2017.08.